A startling scene unfolded in the early hours of September 15, 2025, at Travis Kelce’s gated residence in Leawood, Kansas, when a man identified as Justin Lee Fisher, age 48, was arrested for trespassing after allegedly jumping the fence in an attempt to serve Taylor Swift with deposition papers. The documents were reportedly linked to actor‑director Justin Baldoni’s legal dispute with actress Blake Lively.
Swift’s name surfaced in the case because Baldoni’s team sought to depose her, alleging she was involved in a meeting relevant to the suit. Swift’s legal team strongly denied her involvement and stated she had not agreed to sit for a deposition at that time.
Key Details
- According to police reports, Fisher was arrested around 2 a.m. after the intrusion at the Kelce estate. The official charge was “jumping the fence onto a private residence in a private neighborhood.”
- A one‑page report filed by Leawood Police bore a notation that “This information is restricted as to use and dissemination,” indicating parts of the investigation are sealed.
- Observers say the incident raises serious questions about security, legal tactics, and the nature of celebrity litigation involving third‑party document serving. It also adds tension to an already complicated legal dispute between Baldoni and Lively.
Why It Matters
- The high‑profile nature of the house involved — belonging to an NFL star and global music icon — makes the incident a vivid example of celebrity privacy issues and legal boundary crossing.
- While Swift is not a defendant or target in the case, the attempt to serve her at a private residence adds a layer of risk and raises concerns about how subpoenas and legal processes are handled in celebrity cases.
- For Travis Kelce and Swift, this incident underscores the security challenges they face and could impact how future legal threats or attempts at service are managed.
What to Watch Next
- Whether any formal charges beyond trespassing are filed and whether the court will establish any disciplinary actions or sanctions related to the manner of service.
- If Swift’s team files their own legal motion regarding the incident, possibly raising invasion of privacy or unauthorized access claims.
- How the parent lawsuit between Baldoni and Lively evolves — and whether Swift becomes more deeply involved, or is formally excluded.
- Any changes in document‑service protocols, especially for high‑profile individuals, as a result of this incident.



















0 Comments